Gary, S., Yang, M. Yetton, P., Sterman, J. (2017). Stretch Goals and the Distribution of Organizational Performance. Organization Science 28(3): 395-410.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1131

Abstract

Many academics, consultants, and managers advocate stretch goals to attain superior organizational performance. However, existing theory speculates that, although stretch goals may benefit some organizations, they are not a ‘rule for riches’ for all organizations. To address this speculation, we use two experimental studies to explore the effects on the mean, median, variance, and skewness of performance of stretch compared with moderate goals. Participants were assigned moderate or stretch goals to manage a widely used business simulation. Compared with moderate goals, stretch goals improve performance for a few participants, but many abandon the stretch goals in favor of lower self-set goals, or adopt a survival goal when faced with the threat of bankruptcy. Consequently, stretch goals generate higher performance variance across organizations and a right-skewed performance distribution. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find no positive stretch goal main effect on performance. Instead, stretch goals compared with moderate goals generate large attainment discrepancies that increase willingness to take risks, undermine goal commitment, and generate lower risk-adjusted performance. The results provide a richer theoretical and empirical appreciation of how stretch goals influence performance.

• For Access to This Paper—If you are a student or faculty at another institution and would like a final copy of this paper, please email my assistant Jocelyn using the button below. Jocelyn will send you a final version of the paper for your personal use only. When emailing, please include the title and DOI number of the paper you are requesting.
• Download a Pre-Final Paper
  
• Download Supplement